Article X Special representatives on the issue of borders continue their consultations to find an agreed framework for a border settlement that will serve as the basis for the delimitation and delimitation of the India-China border, which will then be carried out by civilian and military officers and surveyors from both sides. Article XI This agreement enters into force on the date of signing and is amended and complemented by mutual agreement between the two parties. Signed in two ballot boxes in New Delhi on April 11, 2005, in Hindi, Chinese and English, the three texts are also authentic. In case of deviation, priority is given to the English text. For the Government of the Republic of India For the Government of the People`s Republic of China New Delhi 11 April 2005 If the blacksmiths of the 1993 agreement had begun the exercise with the sentence: “Until a definitive solution, each party must strictly respect the line of control and use” instead of the “LAC”, it would have been possible to maintain peace. In such a case, there would have been two existing lines of control on the map, one for the physical use of Chinese troops and the other for the physical intervention of Indian troops. This would have made the areas between the two lines a no man`s land and made the two armies frozen in their positions. Let us now consider paragraph 4 of the 2013 agreement (on cooperation in the field of border defence). It calls on the parties to “cooperate with the other party in the fight against natural disasters or infectious diseases (evidence mines) that may have an impact on the other party or spread to the other side.” Faced with this serious intention, how do we read the latest cycle of Fisticuffs and intense physical scrimmages between Chinese and Indian soldiers who wounded at least 70 Indian soldiers and hospitalized them in Saladian? He could have exposed some of the Indian soldiers to a local Chinese COVID-19 mutation. Do you forget physical renunciation, were they wearing masks? Note: Aspirants should be aware of the 1993 agreement on peacekeeping and calm along the LAC. The continued inability of India and China to make significant progress on the border issue focuses on four agreements signed between the two countries in September 1993, November 1996, April 2005 and October 2013.
Ironically, India and China continue to see these agreements as the basis for the vision of progress on the issue of borders. Unfortunately, these are profoundly erroneous agreements that, at best, make the search for a solution to the border issue a strategic illusion and, at worst, a cynical diplomatic sleight of hand. That`s how. The Government of the Republic of India and the Government of the People`s Republic of China (hereafter referred to as both parties), convinced that they serve the fundamental interests of the peoples of India and China to promote a long-term constructive and cooperative partnership based on the five principles of peaceful coexistence, mutual respect and sensitivity to the concerns and aspirations of the other and equality. , with the desire to qualitatively improve bilateral relations at all levels and in all areas, while addressing differences in a fair, reasonable and mutually acceptable manner through peaceful means, and reaffirming their commitment to respect and implement the agreement on maintaining peace and tranquillity along the effective line of control in the India-China border areas , signed on 7 September 1993, and the agreement on confidence-building measures in the military field, signed on 29 November 1996, along the effective line of control in the India-China border regions, signed on 29 November 1996, and reaffirming the confidence-building measures adopted on 23 November 1996. Recalling that both sides appointed special representatives to review the framework for the settlement of the India-China border issue and that the two special representatives conducted consultations in a friendly, cooperative and constructive atmosphere, noting that the two sides conducted consultations in a friendly, cooperative and constructive atmosphere, noting that both sides had put in place a political solution to the border issue in the as part of their work in generating