Douglas, J. (2015). Agreement (and disagreements) between parents. Cam. Occas. Papers` linguist. 7, 33-60. Mancini, S., Quiones, I., Molinari, N., Hernandez-Cabrera, J., and Carreiras, M. (2017). Detangling meaning in the brain: left-wing involvement in contract treatment.
Cortex 86, 140-155. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.11.008 Bobaljik, J., and Wurmbrand, p. (2005). The area of agreement. Nat. Long. Linguist. Theory 23, 809-865.
doi: 10.1007/s11049-004-004-3792-4 For example, you can say in standard English that I am or that it is, but not “I am” or “it is. This is because the grammar of the language requires that the verb and its subject coincide personally. The pronouns I and him are respectively the first and third person, just as the verbs are and are. The verbage form must be chosen in such a way as to have the same person as the subject, unlike the fictitious agreement based on meaning.   In American English, for example, the expression of the United Nations is treated as singular for the purposes of concordance, although it is formally plural. Preminger, O. (2011). Asymmetry between the person and the number in the syntax: a comment on the baker SCOPA.
Nat. Long. Linguist. Theory 29, 917-937. doi: 10.1007/s11049-011-9155-z Note also the chord that also manifests itself in the subjunctive mood. Keywords: convention, person, number, arrangement, remote contract, relativization, copular specifications phrases, Eintracht In Ch. 1, “Introduction: category differences as the window of the theory of agreement,” B begins with Stassens (1997) universal agreement: people`s convention favored verbs compared to other categories. In Spanish, for example, verbs correspond in number and number, while adjectives correspond in number and gender, but not in person (e.g.
23, p. 22). In Hungarian, verbs have a polypersonal concordance, which means that they correspond to more than one of the arguments of the verb: not only its subject, but also its object (accusative). There is a difference between the case where a particular object is present and the case where the object is indeterminate or if there is no object at all. (Adverbs have no influence on the form of the verb.) Examples: Szeretek (I love someone or something indeterminate), szeretem (I love him, she, or her, or her, specifically), szeretlek (I love you); szeret (he loves me, me, you, someone or something indeterminate), szereti (he loves him, her or her especially). Of course, names or pronouns can specify the exact object. In short, there is agreement between a verb and the person and the number of its subject and the specificity of its object (which often refers more or less precisely to the person). Dillon, B., Mishler, A., Slogget, S., and Phillips, C.
(2013). Contrasting intrusion profiles for adequacy and anaphore: experimental and modeling evidence. I`m J. J. Long. 69, 85-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.04.003 Heck, F., Cuartero, J. (2012). “Long distance agreement in relative clauses,” in Local Modelling of Non-Local Dependencies in Syntax, eds Alexiadou, A., Kiss, T., and Muller, G. (Berlin: Gruyter Sheep), 49-83. “Agreement” is the grammatical phenomenon in which the shape of a post, such as the name of horses.
B, is a second point of the sentence, such as the verb “galop,” in some form, namely: